Simple Leveraging Rotating Header Image

January, 2010:

Oh heck, batten down the hatches for another bumpy ride!!

Sorry to be the “prophet of doom and gloom” amongst the SEO Community but I have just been checking up on all the information abut the latest Google “goings on” i.e. the so called “Caffeine update” and the word on the streets is that things could get a little bumpy for a while.

Now “Caffeine” is lot more than just your “box standard” Google Update so to refer to it as just another update actually doesn’t do it justice, it is much more than that but that is not what actually worries me.

The guys at Web Pro News who know a few things more than I do actually reckon that the effects of this could be worse than the so called “Big Daddy” and “Florida” updates. Remember them? They were infamously and widely regarded amongst the SEO community as some of the darkest days of the Internet where chaos ruled for a short while until most people (including Google) actually caught on as to what exactly was going on and put matters right.

If the after effects of “Caffeine” are going to have as much lasting effect on us as the other two updates then heaven help us all. We already have spoken to two Companies “wiped out” overnight by the effects of Google’s over enthusiasm and inability to actually make sure that everything goes as it should do.

Now I know the Internet and Cyberspace is a pretty big place (understatement of the year) and (as a colleague of mine used to gleefully say) “you can’t make an omelette without cracking a few eggs” that’s not the point. It doesn’t make it any better to be told cheerfully that most of us will not suffer any after effects when you happen to be the unlucky one that has just got wiped out.

It’s a bit like being in theatre of war and being told, don’t worry your latest gunshot wound was caused by “Friendly fire”, there’s nothing friendly about it at all.

Interesting times ahead.

Are Keywords in Domain Names still important?

Hmnnnn, this one’s actually a biggie and speaking as someone who is the main principal behind a keyword rich site name i.e. Simple Leveraging then technically that should “nail my colours” to the mast.

In the interests of fairness let me highlight two opposing viewpoints on the issue and then give you my take.

First up there is Scott Boyd at Fused Nation ( http://www.fusednation.com/seo/q-are-keywords-in-your-domain-name-an-important-ranking-factor/ ) who is of the opinion that “there was a time when keyword domains were synonymous with spam (because as I said, spammers used to buy up keyword domains and throw up spam sites because they used to rank well because of the keyword in the domain). Personally, I ignore link requests and business requests from keyword domains for that reason – this may be the exception rather than the rule, but I believe there are probably a good percentage of website owners who feel the same.”

Whilst I agree with him on certain points in that it did cause a whole wave of “brain dead SEO” i.e. never mind about anything else just get a domain name linked to your keywords I still think having your keywords in a domain name still does have a certain amount of kudos.

These probably relate more to branding awareness and associate issues more than anything else. For example David Airey in his post about the “Real Value of Keyword Rich Domain Names” (http://www.davidairey.com/domain-name-keyword-importance/ ) uses two of his own sites as examples, logodesignlove.com and davidairey.com. He states that: “logodesignlove.com has significantly gained ground on davidairey.com because people use the text ‘logo design’ within their links, as opposed to ‘David Airey’.

An inbound link (one coming from another website) pointing to davidairey.com is most likely to be typed as David Airey. A similar link to logodesignlove.com is most likely to appear as Logo Design Love.

Considering the importance of anchor text on inbound links, this will have quite a bearing on web searches for ‘logo designer’.

With that in mind, the main point still reverts to your content, because if it’s not good quality, you won’t create any inbound links.”

I can understand and agree in parts with all that the above are talking about but as of the date of this post it has to be said that in empirical tests that if possible give me a keyword rich domain name (if available) any day of the week. I am currently looking at a domain name (a .com) registered as part of a potential joint venture in an ecommerce project over 3 months ago that as I write this piece has only a Title tag, a few lines of text and nothing else but is 100% keyword specific for its market (this is DIY and Home Refurbishment) and the domain name is sitting at No 1 in both Google and Yahoo in categories where there is over 450,000 competitors and a limited amount of traffic.

So to sum, if you can, get a keyword rich domain name but don’t lose any sleep if you can’t as a successful name and profile can just as easily be built up using great content (now that’s another issue) and smart SEO. :-)

Are only “Anchor Driven Links” any good?

There has been a great amount written about which types of links are the best, which work best and which ones to avoid.

I hope to refer to this in more depth at a later date but all I will say at this point in time is that (in my opinion) any links are good and indeed there are some Article Directory scripts that only report links in their basic url form as opposed to anchor driven variants.

The other thing to remember folks is that the anchor phrase used in inbound links only represents one of several factors in Google Algorithm and not the only factor. Bear in this mind and also consider the other (quite often) hidden aspect to all of this and this is the fact of IP spread.

This is quite often overlooked by a lot of folks and even when considered by most still don’t completely understand this. It is not always just a case of just getting links from sites with just a slight variation of C Class IP address.

People seem to forget that actually it is much better if you can fill your boots with links from as many A and B Class IP’s first if possible.

For more information about A and B Class IP’s and actually about Internet Protocol matters in general then go here:

http://www.computerhope.com/jargon/i/ip.htm

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classful_network

More later

Page Rank Update underway (apparently)

It appears that as of the time of the post that Google have either completed or in the final stages of completing another Page Rank Update.

As with all events like this there are winners and losers but all I have to say to anyone is that at the end of the day, Page Rank matters damn all in the universal scheme of things, its SERPS that matter and many’s the time I have seen in the SERPS, medium to high PR sites (PR4+) get their butts whipped (as an american colleague of mine so eloquently puts it) by relatively low PR sites (i.e 1 or above).

Here are a few links to how the update is being received in parts Google Page Rank Update Discussion and more detail about this can be found at this Google Info Blog

The Downside of a Linking Footprint

I recently read an old Blog Post about the subject of Linking Foot Prints and the damage they can cause if a Linking Campaign is not carried out correctly. The real reason for this is whether my inbuilt nagging suspicions that most Automated Link building Systems can actually cause more harm than good is justified or not. If anyone wants to find out more about Link Building Footprints and the upside / downside of these then take a glance at this post. It covers quite a lot about this particular subject, is not necessarily the definitive word on the subject but covers most of the basics of Link Building AND Spamming etc.

So back to my “Bete Noire” about Automated Link Building Systems.

The reason for this being that they are so automated (as the name suggests), almost everything is done for you that it is almost like taking a sledgehammer to crack a nut. The real downside is that when you automate something, it necessarily creates a repetitive system and process to carry out this task and thereby hangs the problem, the very repetitiveness of the process itself. It is this repeated action, the repeated submission process, repeated analysis that causes the potential problem. It is all too easy to reverse engineer.

Now OK most folk would call me a complete conspiracy theorist here but all I can respectfully suggest to most readers here is that if I can come up with the logic of reverse engineering an automated Link Building Process then you can bet that Google, Yahoo/MSN et al with their seemingly endless budgets have whole teams dedicated to unwiring the latest attempts at automating a sneaky way to bypass their systems.

The answer to all of this? Programmable defects, programmable flaws or mistakes to replicate an organic Campaign. Take into consideration the Human element, the ability above all to screw up that makes the Human Race such loveable beings.

The reason behind my thinking in all of this stems from my experiences in another Industry that has also seen its fair share of Automation and “Electrification”, the Rock and Roll Industry. Back in the late 70’s and early 80’s (yes folks I am that old) amongst the vanguard of new technologies taking the Industry by storm were programmable synthesizers and Drum Machines. Now these were all very fine but once you had programmed the machine and pressed the “start” button, off it went and delivered by and large what it was supposed to do, over and over…..and over……and over again almost “ad infinitum”. The trouble with all of this is that all the songs using these techniques started to sound the same, the beats and rhythms were the same and all became very boring until some bright spark (at Yamaha I think if I am correct) came up with the idea of replicating a real Human drummer and replicating the pitfalls that used to come along with them also. OK they left out the downsides in that at least a machine was less likely to sleep with your girlfriend but you get my drift? Basically the concept was (and is correct) that there wasn’t a drummer out there (and never has been) that kept perfect time in a piece of music from start to finish. There was the odd one that came close but never any one that got it totally spot on from start to finish and that was what made the music so real, it was this very human flaw that makes music so listenable and enjoyable. So to replicate this, Programmers now started to introduce the concept of the programmable unpredictable “flam” or grace note to break things up a bit and make machines sound a bit more like humans.

So how does this all tie up with my gripe with Automated Link building Systems? Well it is this constant repetition that gets my goat. It is not a case of repetitive excellence it is more a case of just plain old repetitiveness that makes it so easy to spot and do something about.

Come on guys and gals, if you are going to try and come up with latest and best thing in automated systems then come up with something that replicates the human ability to screw up and make your programmes look like the real thing and include mistakes to make them look like the Campaign was indeed carried out by Humans and not systems.

There, got that off my chest.

Get Adobe Flash player